My Sol/s…

You can help updating this table.

Leave your comment below with your Sol/s per GPU, and OC settings, as this might help others to tweak their configurations.

miniZ will try to update these numbers, based on your best reported values.

 

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Comments

  1. viktor says:

    palit game rock 1070 – rig 6x

    av. – 54 sol/s, p0, pl 75%, core +180, memory 0

  2. styleshifter says:

    Laptop with Geforce 940M and 2 GB RAM gets 3.5 Sol/s

  3. Crypto says:

    Dear Team,

    Please shared overclocking setting for GTX 1060 6GB GPU.

  4. ssong says:

    1080ti power limit 69% core +110clock memory -405clock 61 Celcius

    miniZ 1.0j 83~85sol/s
    EWBF v0.6 71~75sol/s

    approx. Pool amount average per day = more over 5~8% EWBF v0.6

  5. Darko says:

    Looked at your 1060 3gb OC settings …

    None of my card with Samsung mem on 60PL cann’t go upper than 110 Core and 500 mem …

    Your ECO table is not OK

    • miniZ says:

      Hi Darko,

      On the 1060GB, with PL=60W (50%), we use core = +250 and mem = -600, in Linux.
      If you are on Windows and use MSI Afterburner: core = +250 and mem = -300.
      We see that we do have a mistake on the table. https://miniz.ch/1445-2/ is correct.(we are updating the other algo pages)

      Thanks for the feedback.
      Cheers

      • Darko says:

        The miniz 1.3n and 1.3n+ have a memory alloc error on 1060 3gb …

        I supose it’s on clocks …

        Im on mmpos (linux system),will try again with +250 and -600

        • Darko says:

          It doesn’t work … Must to change the clocks to 110/500/60PL … The miner on your clocks is all time memory alloc fail …

          • miniZ says:

            Hi Darko,
            Our implementation of BEAM runs very tight on the 1060 3GB, but it works fine on our system.
            Could you show us the output of ./miniZ -ci ?
            Also try to run miniZ with --mode=0 (it will run slower… but it is good to know if it works).
            Does the miner tells you the ammount of memory it wants to allocate?

            Cheers,
            miniZ

  6. Darko says:

    It says 2924 needed to allocate …

    Aain on hive it was a invalid share period (a little bit long),when it got 88k invalid shares

    • Darko says:

      Another invalid shares on mmpos …

      • miniZ says:

        Hi Darko,
        Thanks for reporting, are you using sparkpool?
        There might some issue with this pool, we are looking into it.
        About the 3GB card, whe you have time cloud give us the output of
        ./miniZ -ci ? That would help us to understand why you do not have enough memory.
        Cheers,
        miniZ

        • Darko says:

          Don’t have the ./miniZ directory …

          Again a fail on HiveOS,yes it is with sparkpool …

          Now I cann’t start the miner again … 1.3n+ version

  7. Darko says:

    |——————————-+———————-+———————-+
    | GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
    | Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
    |===============================+======================+======================|
    | 0 GeForce GTX 106… On | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
    | 60% 68C P2 78W / 90W | 2851MiB / 3019MiB | 100% Default |
    +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
    | 1 GeForce GTX 1070 On | 00000000:03:00.0 Off | N/A |
    | 60% 58C P2 99W / 100W | 3409MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default |
    +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
    | 2 GeForce GTX 1070 On | 00000000:04:00.0 Off | N/A |
    | 60% 55C P2 111W / 100W | 3409MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default |
    +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
    | 3 GeForce GTX 106… On | 00000000:05:00.0 Off | N/A |
    | 60% 57C P2 65W / 90W | 2851MiB / 3019MiB | 100% Default |
    +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
    | 4 GeForce GTX 106… On | 00000000:06:00.0 Off | N/A |
    | 60% 65C P2 85W / 90W | 2851MiB / 3019MiB | 100% Default |
    +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
    | 5 GeForce GTX 107… On | 00000000:07:00.0 Off | N/A |
    | 60% 61C P2 115W / 120W | 3429MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default |
    +——————————-+———————-+———————-+

    +—————————————————————————–+
    | Processes: GPU Memory |
    | GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
    |=============================================================================|
    | 0 1979 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
    | 0 21193 C /hive/miners/gminer/1.39/miner 2833MiB |
    | 1 1979 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
    | 1 21193 C /hive/miners/gminer/1.39/miner 3391MiB |
    | 2 1979 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
    | 2 21193 C /hive/miners/gminer/1.39/miner 3391MiB |
    | 3 1979 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
    | 3 21193 C /hive/miners/gminer/1.39/miner 2833MiB |
    | 4 1979 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
    | 4 21193 C /hive/miners/gminer/1.39/miner 2833MiB |
    | 5 1979 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
    | 5 21193 C /hive/miners/gminer/1.39/miner 3411MiB |
    +—————————————————————————–+
    root@Nvidia:~#

    • Darko says:

      root@Nvidia:~# nvidia-smi
      Mon Apr 29 09:59:49 2019
      +—————————————————————————–+
      | NVIDIA-SMI 396.54 Driver Version: 396.54 |
      |——————————-+———————-+———————-+
      | GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
      | Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
      |===============================+======================+======================|
      | 0 GeForce GTX 106… On | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
      | 60% 65C P2 77W / 80W | 3007MiB / 3019MiB | 100% Default |
      +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
      | 1 GeForce GTX 1070 On | 00000000:03:00.0 Off | N/A |
      | 60% 57C P2 102W / 100W | 4653MiB / 8119MiB | 98% Default |
      +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
      | 2 GeForce GTX 1070 On | 00000000:04:00.0 Off | N/A |
      | 60% 55C P2 102W / 100W | 4653MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default |
      +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
      | 3 GeForce GTX 106… On | 00000000:05:00.0 Off | N/A |
      | 60% 59C P2 71W / 80W | 3007MiB / 3019MiB | 100% Default |
      +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
      | 4 GeForce GTX 106… On | 00000000:06:00.0 Off | N/A |
      | 60% 63C P2 83W / 80W | 3007MiB / 3019MiB | 100% Default |
      +——————————-+———————-+———————-+
      | 5 GeForce GTX 107… On | 00000000:07:00.0 Off | N/A |
      | 60% 60C P2 103W / 110W | 4673MiB / 8119MiB | 100% Default |
      +——————————-+———————-+———————-+

      +—————————————————————————–+
      | Processes: GPU Memory |
      | GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
      |=============================================================================|
      | 0 1982 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
      | 0 23809 C /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/miniZ 2989MiB |
      | 1 1982 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
      | 1 23809 C /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/miniZ 4635MiB |
      | 2 1982 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
      | 2 23809 C /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/miniZ 4635MiB |
      | 3 1982 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
      | 3 23809 C /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/miniZ 2989MiB |
      | 4 1982 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
      | 4 23809 C /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/miniZ 2989MiB |
      | 5 1982 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 6MiB |
      | 5 23809 C /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/miniZ 4655MiB |
      +—————————————————————————–+
      This is with miniZ miner 1.3n2 (started half hour ago 9.30 am CET)

      • Darko says:

        Another failture …

        The miner was down after 3 hours …

        • miniZ says:

          Hi Darko,
          Did you manage to run the 3GB cards?
          Your failures appear to be related with the OC settings, remember that different miners require different settings.
          On the upcoming version 1.3n3 it should be easier to see the GPU errors. You can download it already https://miniz.ch/download/
          Cheers

          • Darko says:

            The LA is high 2 most in red on hive …

            invalid shares,also on sunpool …

            will try now with n3 version

            • miniZ says:

              Hi Darko,
              Thanks for taking you time to report and test.
              After the main stability issues we had with the version 1.3 are fixed, we will look after the high LA.
              Cheers

  8. Darko says:

    The miner is working for 12 hours now,with a smaller number of inwalid shares …
    (changed the pool to sunpool wich is in germania and I’m in croatia so the latecy should be low)

    the n3 version is much,much better must say now it’s a great work from your side …

    And the LA will come in some days,I hope 🙂

    • miniZ says:

      Hi Darko,
      thanks for letting us know that it is working fine for you.
      Mining to sparkpool is working fine now, but it is true that you may get better latency from closer servers.
      We keep trying to improve the LA 🙂
      Cheers

  9. Steve says:

    1070tis – Average 25 S/s – +100 core, + 500 Mem – 70% power
    1080tis – Average 36 S/s – +100 core, + 500 Mem – 70% power
    1070’s – Average 21 S/s – +100 core, + 500 Mem – 70% power

    1070tis – Average 26 S/s – +100 core, + 700 Mem – 70% power
    1080tis – Average 36 S/s – +100 core, + 700 Mem – 70% power
    1070’s – Average 21.5 S/s – +100 core, + 700 Mem – 70% power

  10. ZhieN says:

    0>GTX 1060 3GB 99.8% [55°C/80%] 16.88 I/s 33.6(33.7)Sol/s 91( 90.0)W clk=1847MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.37
    1>GTX 1060 3GB
    100% [61°C/80%] 16.98 I/s 34.4(33.8)Sol/s 89( 89.8)W clk=1809MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.38
    2>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57°C/80%] 17.01 I/s 34.4(33.9)Sol/s 97( 90.0)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.38
    3>GTX 1060 3GB
    100% [59°C/80%] 17.17 I/s 34.7(34.4)Sol/s 93( 90.4)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.38

    GTX 1060 3GB : Power 80 | Core Clock 99% | Memory Clock 399% | Fan Speed 80%

  11. CuChO says:

    Just stopping by and drooping my test , I test OC1 and got less sols and OC2 is slightly less then my own clocks on its own , I try some of the values from the tablet but didn’t do anything , like a quick explain will be once the gpu need more power to OC higher any from +100 to +150 wont affect that’s how I got to know my GPUs in Windows but downclocking memory this make space for more OC on core.
    So on afterburner I run my 2070s at -270 on Memory and my 1080s a -370 , for some reason this allow me to OC higher the clocks
    My GPUS Models taking the order from the list are
    GPU0 MSI Duke Triple Fans RTX2070 stock clocks are a bit lower compared to the GPU1
    GPU1 MSI Duke Triple Fans RTX2070 this card has better clocks
    GPU2 Zotac Mini RTX2070 cards has good clocks compare to the other Zotac
    GPU3 EVGA Gaming GTX1080 overall hash is good comparing to my others cards
    GPU4 Zotac Mini RTX2070 clocks are lowers then the GPU2 in stocks settings
    GPU5 Gigabyte Gaming OC edition GTX1080 worse card , this card need more power in order to OC higher
    GPU6 Asus Gaming Strix GTX1080 good clocks will run most of the time same hashrate as GPU7
    GPU7 EVGA SC GTX1080 Best card ever since has higher clocks with out the need of increasing power

    My Clocks
    [ 0d 1h56m45s] 524(523.7)Sol/s 1002(1016.1)W
    0>RTX 2070 100% [51°C/51%] 35.87 I/s 72.1(71.0)Sol/s 128(128.5)W clk=1680MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.55
    1>RTX 2070
    100% [53°C/53%]*36.10 I/s 72.4(72.1)Sol/s 128(128.4)W clk=1695MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.56
    2>RTX 2070 100% [61°C/61%] 33.48 I/s 66.7(67.7)Sol/s 124(124.0)W clk=1590MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.55
    3>GTX 1080
    100% [52°C/52%] 30.23 I/s 60.8(61.7)Sol/s 117(124.3)W clk=1607MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.50
    4>RTX 2070 100% [59°C/60%]*32.16 I/s 63.6(64.2)Sol/s 124(124.4)W clk=1515MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.52
    5>GTX 1080
    100% [55°C/55%] 30.43 I/s 60.6(60.6)Sol/s 131(133.8)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.45
    6>GTX 1080 100% [50°C/51%] 31.65 I/s 63.4(62.9)Sol/s 128(129.3)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.49
    7>GTX 1080
    100% [55°C/55%] 31.96 I/s 64.2(63.6)Sol/s 121(125.6)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.51

    oc1
    [ 0d 0h 5m12s] 509(509.4)Sol/s 991(997.6)W
    0>RTX 2070 100% [52°C/52%] 35.84 I/s 71.4(71.7)Sol/s 129(128.6)W clk=1695MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.56
    1>RTX 2070
    100% [53°C/52%] 36.16 I/s 72.7(73.0)Sol/s 129(128.6)W clk=1695MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.57
    2>RTX 2070 100% [61°C/60%] 33.49 I/s 66.3(66.7)Sol/s 123(124.0)W clk=1590MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.54
    3>GTX 1080
    100% [52°C/52%] 28.87 I/s 58.1(58.1)Sol/s 115(121.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.48
    4>RTX 2070 100% [59°C/60%] 32.26 I/s 65.5(65.3)Sol/s 125(124.6)W clk=1515MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.52
    5>GTX 1080
    100% [53°C/53%] 28.90 I/s 57.0(57.1)Sol/s 132(127.7)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.45
    6>GTX 1080 100% [50°C/50%] 29.16 I/s 58.6(58.4)Sol/s 117(123.5)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.47
    7>GTX 1080
    100% [55°C/54%] 29.25 I/s 58.4(58.5)Sol/s 120(119.0)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.49

    -oc2
    [ 0d 0h 5m32s] 517(517.3)Sol/s 1009(1009.6)W
    0>RTX 2070 100% [52°C/52%] 35.74 I/s 71.0(71.1)Sol/s 128(128.5)W clk=1665MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.55
    1>RTX 2070
    100% [53°C/53%] 36.11 I/s 71.6(71.6)Sol/s 128(128.5)W clk=1695MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.56
    2>RTX 2070 100% [61°C/61%]*33.46 I/s 66.4(66.5)Sol/s 123(123.6)W clk=1605MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.54
    3>GTX 1080
    100% [52°C/53%] 30.17 I/s 61.3(61.0)Sol/s 123(122.0)W clk=1607MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.50
    4>RTX 2070 100% [60°C/60%] 32.16 I/s 62.7(63.1)Sol/s 124(124.4)W clk=1530MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.51
    5>GTX 1080
    100% [54°C/54%] 30.25 I/s 61.3(61.0)Sol/s 134(132.7)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.46
    6>GTX 1080 100% [50°C/50%] 30.88 I/s 61.0(60.8)Sol/s 128(126.9)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.48
    7>GTX 1080
    100% [55°C/55%] 31.18 I/s 62.1(62.1)Sol/s 120(123.0)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.51
    -oc2 test 2
    [ 0d 0h56m28s] 518(519.1)Sol/s 1015(1006.3)W
    0>RTX 2070 100% [51°C/51%] 35.66 I/s 71.5(71.3)Sol/s 129(128.4)W clk=1680MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.56
    1>RTX 2070
    100% [53°C/53%] 36.21 I/s 72.1(72.1)Sol/s 129(128.5)W clk=1695MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.56
    2>RTX 2070 100% [61°C/60%] 33.46 I/s 66.2(66.9)Sol/s 124(123.9)W clk=1605MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.54
    3>GTX 1080
    100% [52°C/52%] 30.16 I/s 59.9(60.4)Sol/s 127(122.0)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.50
    4>RTX 2070 100% [60°C/60%] 32.09 I/s 64.0(64.4)Sol/s 124(124.4)W clk=1515MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.52
    5>GTX 1080
    100% [54°C/54%] 30.24 I/s 60.5(60.4)Sol/s 131(130.4)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.46
    6>GTX 1080 100% [50°C/49%] 30.88 I/s 61.1(61.6)Sol/s 122(124.8)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.49
    7>GTX 1080
    100% [55°C/55%] 31.18 I/s 62.1(61.9)Sol/s 129(124.1)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.50

    Note: The Gigabyte card if I go positive on memory the core will just drop -100 just because of the power limit, card is a 200 watts model same as the ASUS , the Zotacs Minis are rated a 175 watts , the rest is 180 watts models

    • miniZ says:

      Hi CuChO,
      First of all THANKS a lot for the feedback!

      Second, our GPUs are from different brand but they should be more or less similar. Except for the minis, these tend to be a bit slower but not so much, likely due to power limit as you mentioned. However, your 2070 seems to be running faster than ours 🙂

      Finally, we believe that we need to clarfy something because from what you wrote it looks that we were not clear in our previous suggestions, sorry for this. The --oc1/2 in the command line does not apply OCs to the GPU, it just makes the GPU run with different kernel functions. When you adjust the OCs in Afterburner (or other program) and run miniZ without --oc1/2 the miner will run with the default kernels (usually optimized for stock settings). So, in summary the --oc‘s just change the way miniZ runs not the OC settings of the GPU. We hope this is clear now. We’ll try to make it more clear also in FAQ.

      In Table 2, we applied the OCs as shown *and* ran the 1080 with --oc1. At least for our 1080 Eco running with –oc1 boosts performance.

      Thanks for your preference!
      Cheers

      Note 1: For memory clock in AF, you need to divide our value by 2. We have a note there in darkred.
      Note 2: --oc1/2 can be set up per GPU if necessary, check FAQ page.

      • CuChO says:

        thanks make more sense , like a not good OC the –oc options will help to get extra hash in case if there is any missing , I post the clocks that they are actually running since +100 or any other number doesn’t apply unless every card can run on the same core right out of the box 😀 but on memory this all match since they all run a same like 1080s have the same memory speed . Well maybe is Linux I read there are better hashrate there, thanks for the help.
        Cheers guys great work on this miner

  12. CuChO says:

    Another benchmark for 192,7
    My GPUS Models and Afterburner settings
    GPU0 MSI Duke Triple Fans RTX2070 70% +100 core -270Mem
    GPU1 MSI Duke Triple Fans RTX2070 70% +50 core -270Mem
    GPU2 Zotac Mini RTX2070 71% +125 core -270Mem
    GPU3 EVGA Gaming GTX1080 70% +100 core + 0Mem
    GPU4 Zotac Mini RTX2070 71% +150 core -270Mem
    GPU5 Gigabyte Gaming OC edition GTX1080 65% +120 core -370Mem
    GPU6 Asus Gaming Strix GTX1080 65% +150 core + 0Mem
    GPU7 EVGA SC GTX1080 70% +100 core + 0Mem

    0d 8h50m53s] 298(297.3)Sol/s 992(1002.7)W
    0>RTX 2070 100% [51°C/51%] 20.52 I/s 40.7(41.1)Sol/s 127(127.6)W clk=1665MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.32
    1>RTX 2070
    100% [53°C/53%] 20.66 I/s 41.5(41.2)Sol/s 127(126.7)W clk=1695MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.33
    2>RTX 2070 100% [61°C/61%] 19.18 I/s 38.1(38.3)Sol/s 123(123.0)W clk=1590MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.31
    3>GTX 1080
    100% [52°C/52%] 17.41 I/s 34.5(34.6)Sol/s 116(122.8)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4513MHz Sol/W=0.28
    4>RTX 2070 100% [60°C/60%] 18.52 I/s 37.2(37.0)Sol/s 123(123.7)W clk=1515MHz mclk=6530MHz Sol/W=0.30
    5>GTX 1080
    100% [55°C/55%] 16.98 I/s 34.5(33.7)Sol/s 134(132.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4140MHz Sol/W=0.25
    6>GTX 1080 100% [51°C/50%]*17.84 I/s 35.8(35.5)Sol/s 118(124.7)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4513MHz Sol/W=0.28
    7>GTX 1080
    100% [54°C/54%] 18.06 I/s 35.9(36.0)Sol/s 124(123.2)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4513MHz Sol/W=0.29

  13. Jamie says:

    Help please I have 2 1070 Asus Turbo
    tried many settings but not getting passed 32 sol/s (always stabilizes down to 30 or 31 sol/s)
    here is the settings
    Core 180-185 Memory 1500-1250 Power 120 both. HiveOS
    0>GTX 1070 100% [63°C/70%] 15.59 I/s 31.3(31.0)Sol/s 119(117.5)W clk=1607MHz mclk=4428MHz Sol/W=0.26 1.989 Sol/I
    1>GTX 1070
    100% [64°C/70%] 15.63 I/s 31.5(31.1)Sol/s 120(118.1)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.26 1.996 Sol/I
    help would be appreciated thanks 🙂

    • miniZ says:

      Hi Jamie,
      sorry for taking a bit longer to reply.
      Which algo are you mining?
      In the next version there will be some improvements for the 1070. However, if we know the algo we may be able to help you before the release.
      Thanks!
      Cheers

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *